> Actually it should be I was talking about how people typically communicate in spoken language. > There's nothing wrong with using the second-person - but cr

> Actually it should be I was talking about how people typically communicate in spoken language. > There's nothing wrong with using the second-person - but criticizing the author based one I didn't criticize the author at all. And I'd ask you the same thing as I asked the person I was originally replying to... do you think there's something wrong with the alternatives to "one"?