3 ms·
Disclaimer: US border control, including in this case, is in my view terrible, unjust, and counterproductive. That being said: There's a weird "OMG A JOURNALIS
by mzw_mzw 10y ago
Disclaimer: US border control, including in this case, is in my view terrible, unjust, and counterproductive. That being said:
There's a weird "OMG A JOURNALIST WAS HASSLED!" angle to the story that, frankly, smells of aristocratic entitlement. Journalists aren't some superior class entitled to swan about the world freely while us filthy plebeians wait in line for toilet paper; at least in America, they're citizens with no more -- and no fewer -- rights than anyone else, and that's the way it should be. The First Amendment is for every citizen, not just those who've managed to get credentials with someone.
Indeed, anyone advocating a reduction to border search insanity is likely harming their cause by linking it to journalists in particular, since journalists are such a widely despised group. There's going to be a nonzero number of people who are going to hear about a journalist being given trouble at the border, even unjustly, and think "good," not "wow, that could happen to me."
- DanBC 10y ago> at least in America, they're citizens with no more -- and no fewer -- rights than anyone else The border problems journalists have are mostly not connected to their 1st amendment rights (which, after all, only operate for journalists inside the US) but are about protecting sources. Many of the US states have laws to protect journalistic materials and journalist's sources.