4 ms·
> It's easy to verify that a plugin modifies the Facebook site No, it doesn't. That's a serious abuse of the language. What you describe would be hacking into
by EdHominem 10y ago
> It's easy to verify that a plugin modifies the Facebook site
No, it doesn't. That's a serious abuse of the language. What you describe would be hacking into Facebook.
What the plugin does is help me not load content I don't want.
The browser is my user-agent and I'm instructing it how to display the content delivered to me.
> It's much harder to tell whether the list of fake news sites it uses is itself fake
Exactly, and yet they're trying harder to block a fact checker than to block the bad news.
If they just backed off on both I could see the bad news and have my plugin flag it.
> or the plugin is a security issue,
Not even close. It's not like Facebook is cleaning up malware plugins.
They're only targeting this one because it threatens their editorial control of my feed.
- jamespo 10y agowhich they are completely within their rights to do
- EdHominem 10y agoWell, actually, perhaps not. That's the point. Past a certain size, if you're sleazy and manipulative we're going to control your actions. But even if, how is that "sure, but you can't legally stop them" a defense? How is it one you feel compelled to make? Especially because I can technologically stop them. They can block one plugin, and detect one set of blocks, but it's a game we've played many times before and the defense always loses.