Am I the only one who think this kind of goes against the spirit of open source? I thought the idea is to allow everyone to contribute to shared solutions for t

Am I the only one who think this kind of goes against the spirit of open source? I thought the idea is to allow everyone to contribute to shared solutions for the common good. Here instead one engineer has convinced his employer to share some of the code they invested on, so that he could then quit the company and go and charge a fortune working as a consultant. The obvious solution would be to pass on the torch, or at least share the burden. But he's unwilling to do so. I guess being the main maintainer of Hapi is what allows him to charge $2k per day to his clients.