I think you've fundamentally misunderstood m3ta's comment. You seem to have understood it as: "A species dying off very easily is sometimes a good thing for ev

I think you've fundamentally misunderstood m3ta's comment. You seem to have understood it as: "A species dying off very easily is sometimes a good thing for evolution." In response to this, your response is justified. When in fact, what m3ta is saying is: "Members of a species dying very easily is sometimes an evolutionary advantage for that species." In response to this, your response is a non-sequitur.