I don't know that the author is qualified to say either way after only two weeks of using it; but I agree with many of the conclusions. I have used Angular 2 i

I don't know that the author is qualified to say either way after only two weeks of using it; but I agree with many of the conclusions. I have used Angular 2 in a professional setting for as long as there have been alphas(until recently, when I stopped). I am deeply familiar with its internals and have worked on debugging software for it. I don't want to sound mean, but I don't think anyone should use Angular 2. I cannot think of a problem which is solved well, let alone the best, by Angular 2. Angular 1.x has some redeeming qualities, especially if you're trying to build out a semi-smart form or CRUD application, but Angular 2 makes these things markedly harder, while introducing massive complexity from build processes to content delivery. There are serious flaws in the template compiler. Despite many months of concerted, professional effort to document the framework, the documentation is still inadequate to explain the exposed behaviour. TypeScript suffers from all of the flaws expressed by the author of this article, if however slightly redeemed by decent autocomplete in VSCode (though I don't benefit, as an Emacs user). I think it's fair to say that there is no authority to this post; but it is equally fair to say that he is nonetheless right on most counts.