3 ms·

To be fair, Uber is a much better example, Airbnb not so much. Uber is shitty in the way it treats drivers, but the majority don't seem to have an issue with th

by snuxoll 10y ago

To be fair, Uber is a much better example, Airbnb not so much. Uber is shitty in the way it treats drivers, but the majority don't seem to have an issue with the platform (doesn't excuse their behavior). The housing laws Airbnb is constantly battling with are to protect residents from inflated housing costs, and if Airbnb gets its way it is going to do actual damage compared to the "think of the taxi drivers" silliness that Uber runs into.

nickpsecurity 10y ago
"Uber is a much better example, Airbnb not so much. Uber is shitty in the way it treats drivers, but the majority don't seem to have an issue with the platform (doesn't excuse their behavior). " I'll take that one. Especially "think of the taxi drivers silliness." It's the kind of stuff I'm talking about that's politically motivated.
ThrustVectoring 10y ago
Uhh, that's generally not the purpose of housing laws. Residents generally benefit from higher housing prices, since they usually own houses. From what I understand, it's a mix of giving political power to local homeowners, protecting housing prices, and opposing things that make the area less desirable to live in. NIMBY bullshit, basically. I mean, sure, it's marketed as being a measure to control housing prices, but so is rent control.
- snuxoll 10y ago
  Property owners benefit from higher housing prices, in dense urban areas these are not typically the same people that occupy the dwelling. Renting out apartments on Airbnb removes that unit from the local housing stock, raising prices as demand increases and supply drops. This is why San Francisco is battling with Airbnb, housing is already expensive enough, having people sub-let apartments or buy houses only to put them up on Airbnb is making an already bad housing shortage even worse.

3 ms·

To be fair, Uber is a much better example, Airbnb not so much. Uber is shitty in the way it treats drivers, but the majority don't seem to have an issue with th

by snuxoll 10y ago

nickpsecurity 10y ago
"Uber is a much better example, Airbnb not so much. Uber is shitty in the way it treats drivers, but the majority don't seem to have an issue with the platform (doesn't excuse their behavior). " I'll take that one. Especially "think of the taxi drivers silliness." It's the kind of stuff I'm talking about that's politically motivated.
ThrustVectoring 10y ago
Uhh, that's generally not the purpose of housing laws. Residents generally benefit from higher housing prices, since they usually own houses. From what I understand, it's a mix of giving political power to local homeowners, protecting housing prices, and opposing things that make the area less desirable to live in. NIMBY bullshit, basically. I mean, sure, it's marketed as being a measure to control housing prices, but so is rent control.
- snuxoll 10y ago
  Property owners benefit from higher housing prices, in dense urban areas these are not typically the same people that occupy the dwelling. Renting out apartments on Airbnb removes that unit from the local housing stock, raising prices as demand increases and supply drops. This is why San Francisco is battling with Airbnb, housing is already expensive enough, having people sub-let apartments or buy houses only to put them up on Airbnb is making an already bad housing shortage even worse.