> for Google's security team to be taken seriously, you require that Google alter their liability posture If they seriously believe that they have the ability

> for Google's security team to be taken seriously, you require that Google alter their liability posture If they seriously believe that they have the ability to ship a secure browser what would it matter? The other question I have is if they have this capability, why haven't they? Here's what I believe. Google will never ship a modern, full featured, standards compliant, and secure browser. Specifically they will never ship a secure browser. >Who could possibly find such an argument convincing? Pretty much the entirety of the rest of trade across the entire world. When was the last time your grocery store was allowed to sell you rotten food liability free? Companies, in fact, routinely are sued and fined for fraud and false claims. Chipotle just got sued for advertising a 300 calorie burrito that wasn't 300 calories. Why should Google (and Google employees) be able to make false claims and then later insist in their EULAs that they don't actually have to abide by.