3 ms·

If you kill a product you own, you are not squashing the competition, are you? Again, if Lala hadn't sold, they'd still be open.

• lenley 17y ago
  Where's the evidence of LaLa's ability to maintain operations?
  • ahoyhere 17y ago
    If they had to sell because they built a business they couldn't afford to run… it's their fault, not Apple's. Again, blame the founders who sold the business, not the buyer.
    • lenley 17y ago
      I agree with you, I think LaLa had an innovative and interesting model; however, it wasn't profitable and tht's why Apple was able to buy it --clearly they had something else in mind.