I was interested in finding out more about this article there is a more detailed write up on law.com - http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202432065544&Blogg

I was interested in finding out more about this article there is a more detailed write up on law.com - http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202432065544&Blogger_Sued_For_Defamation_Cant_Invoke_Shield_Law_Says_NJ_Judge http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202432065544&Blog... I think this is where she went wrong: "Hale weighed in on the subject, accusing Too Much Media of engaging in fraud and "illegal and unethical use of technology," violating New Jersey's Identity Theft Protection Act and profiting from stolen e-mail addresses. She also said the company's principals "may threaten your life if you report any of the specifics." So first of all, she has a blog but that is not where her comments were - they were on a forum. Second, she is claiming this company is using click fraud to not pay its affiliates and saying they are stealing email addresses. I don't get how being a journalist would help her in this case. Maybe instead her defense should have been proving her accusations?