4 ms·
If you're in CA, it makes sense to just pay your employees a little more cash and let them get an individual policy. Honestly, that was always the best even bef
by themagician 10y ago
If you're in CA, it makes sense to just pay your employees a little more cash and let them get an individual policy. Honestly, that was always the best even before the ACA. And that way you never have to worry about losing it if you change jobs.
My individual policy when I first started was really cheap—$171/month (with a reasonably high deductible, $5k I think). It's now $350—something. So yeah, it's doubled. But it covers more things under the ACA and honestly the price seems fair to me. Just pay employees an extra $5k a year and then they have non-revocable, transferable insurance.
I honestly wish employer health insurance would go away. Like, make it illegal and just have everyone get an individual policy. Yes, companies would have to pay employees an extra $5-10k cash, but I feel like tax incentives could be created on both sides to make this possible and beneficial for everyone.
- chris_7 10y ago> Honestly, that was always the best even before the ACA. Preexisting conditions?
- jochakovsky 10y agoThis seems really inefficient - group plans are cheaper than individual plans, and the premiums are tax-deductible, unlike individual plans. I suspect you're also driving away older workers, since the ACA allows insurance companies to charge older customers up to 3 times as much as younger ones. Maybe it would be ideal for everyone to be on the individual market and for group plans not to exist, but that's not the world we live in.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]