3 ms·
Maybe, but it seems to follow from this judgement that you can write the exact same thing, with the same number of readers and the same impact on the public int
by pmccool 16y ago
Maybe, but it seems to follow from this judgement that you can write the exact same thing, with the same number of readers and the same impact on the public interest and get treated differently depending on whether you're part of a "news organization" or not. I don't follow the justification for that...
- anigbrowl 16y agoYou don't have to be part of an existing media organization; there's a fundamental difference between publishing (eg by having your own blog) and just dumping it out there as a comment. With your own blog, you're staking out territory and making a claim to provide something - at least assuming you didn't set it up to disseminate this one thing, in which case it might be wiser to use wikileaks or somesuch. And then, there's a difference between just dumping stuff in public view and acting like an actual journalist by providing supplementary information, context and reaction from involved parties or expert commentators. I'm a big fan of using the internet for journalism, but to claim that title you've got to demonstrate a commitment to editorial standards and accuracy.