2 ms·
Other threads related to autopilot (mainly Tesla), with great posts that explained in detail why this problem is unlikely to arise in reality and that the resul
by antisthenes 10y ago
Other threads related to autopilot (mainly Tesla), with great posts that explained in detail why this problem is unlikely to arise in reality and that the resultant action undertaken by the system would be the same in both scenarios (e.g. apply brakes as hard as possible).
IIRC part of the explanation was that a human is unlikely to make a qualified choice in a situation like this anyway, so programming a decision matrix based on the utility of the target into the crash avoidance mechanism is moot. Something like 99.999% of the safety benefit would be achieved by a faster brake response time.
- skuhn 10y agoIt's also pointless to worry about because the proposed dilemma greatly overestimates the ability of computer vision systems to determine what an object actually is. These systems are looking for obstacles and road contours. They don't know that the obstruction in the road is a human baby, let alone the composition of an adjacent wall.