3 ms·
Why didn't we think of this sooner? Because we did! For instance, this is exactly the approach that we have released back in 2009 with http://opalang.org http:
by hbbio 10y ago
Why didn't we think of this sooner?
Because we did!
For instance, this is exactly the approach that we have released back in 2009 with http://opalang.org http://opalang.org
Naturally, there are things we would implement differently today, but the OCaml codebase of the compiler is still, in my humble and biased opinion, pretty valid.
- zem 10y agois opa still alive and being used? i was pretty excited about it when it was released (especially when it still had the ML syntax), but it never seemed to gain any traction.
- hbbio 10y agoThanks zem! Yes, Opa is still used in several projects and pretty stable. But the project is asleep and not very active as of now.