4 ms·
This has nothing to do with objective rules. It has to do with the leftist censorship - exactly what I talked about. You are preaching dogma. "If you don't subj
by blahi 10y ago
This has nothing to do with objective rules. It has to do with the leftist censorship - exactly what I talked about. You are preaching dogma. "If you don't subject and do what we tell you, you are wrong. If you talk, we will ignore you. If we can, we will isolate and mute you".
Perhaps my previous ban was deserved. This is surely not. Hackernews and Ycombinator have made it very clear that they are a conduit for leftist ideas and there is no place for differing opinions.
Now I understand how so many people hate you so much that they had to turn to Trump, LePen, Farage.
- dang 10y agoAlthough your comment is false, I'm unkilling it so as to explain (to the community) why it's false. Posting things like "you don't know jack shit" will get you banned on HN. Obviously that isn't political censorship. It's the first resort of every banned ideologue on HN to claim that they're being repressed (favorite word, 'silenced') because of politics X, but we actually try hard not to do that, for nearly any value of X. I say 'nearly' because there are no absolute rules of moderation, but it's as true as we can reasonably make it.
- blahi 10y agoThis was not an attack! It was rhetorical. I have never ever before claimed to be banned because of politics. I always sneared at people who claimed this. Today, I realize that I shouldn't be so quick to dismiss. Ycombinator attacked Peter Theil for his support for Trump. Objectivity and impartiality is out of the question.