4 ms·
Depending on your use case, that may not be such a great idea. Unless Red Hat have back-ported it, 1.10 misses several important security advances that have co
by raesene6 10y ago
Depending on your use case, that may not be such a great idea. Unless Red Hat have back-ported it, 1.10 misses several important security advances that have come into Docker in recent versions...
- SEJeff 10y agoRedhat also has a lot of security features not in upstream docker due to docker, inc not accepting them: Source: https://github.com/projectatomic/docker/tree/410e23a7eeb52d4e7eadf4ee3fcee18283b8cb00#red-hat-patches https://github.com/projectatomic/docker/tree/410e23a7eeb52d4...
- justincormack 10y agoThat seccomp patch reduces rather than increases security. None of the others, other than back ports, are security features.
- SEJeff 10y agoDisabling the docker hub certainly is.
- justincormack 10y agoIn what way? It changes a default, but it only changes namespaces, not security.