3 ms·
Just to provide some balance: Chrome exploits are not as rare as you claim in this post. Pretty much any time Pwn2Own or similar contests are held, with non-tri
by tdullien 10y ago
Just to provide some balance: Chrome exploits are not as rare as you claim in this post. Pretty much any time Pwn2Own or similar contests are held, with non-trivial prize money, somebody brings a fully working Chrome exploit.
If you check https://zerodium.com/program.html https://zerodium.com/program.html you can see that the current market prize for a Chrome exploit with sandbox escape is about 80k USD. Firefox is cheaper (30k USD), but only by a bit more than factor 2.
(I've been working on security vulnerabilities pretty continuously since 1998, so I somewhat know what I am talking about)
In general, for any major browser: Given the size, complexity, and code churn, an attacker just needs enough motivation / time.
- tdullien 10y agoAlso, it is safe to say that ChakraCore (the JS interpreter inside Edge) is much more broken / easier to find bugs in than Firefox, at least at the moment.
- lima 10y agoI fully agree with you, Chrome isn't magically secure either (especially with Flash and Windows prior to Win10). The Chrome and project zero bug trackers are full of PoCs for old vulnerabilities. It's just in a much better shape than Firefox. Did not know those prices were public, really interesting.