4 ms·
And it's not just for $600 or larger transactions, it's an accumulation of said transactions for a tax year. This is going to be a paperwork nightmare.
by roboneal 16y ago
And it's not just for $600 or larger transactions, it's an accumulation of said transactions for a tax year. This is going to be a paperwork nightmare.
- ohashi 16y agoWell to be fair the original way of doing it was an accumulation over a year, they simply expanded what they were covering. Not saying I am happy about it.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- CWuestefeld 16y agoMaybe it's intended as a subsidy for the Postal Service.
- bd_at_rivenhill 16y agoIt's intended as a subsidy for accountants and tax lawyers. Congress is the biggest example of regulatory capture anywhere: the lawyers always win.
- nrj 16y agoI am an independent contractor, and I probably spend more than 600$ at Starbucks in a full year.