Where exactly was I wrong? I said[1] there's a point where existing programs can't be extended. Python2 programmers have to decide whether they're choosing pyt

Where exactly was I wrong? I said[1] there's a point where existing programs can't be extended. Python2 programmers have to decide whether they're choosing python3 or something else. And then there's this surreal suggestion that I recommend replacing python2 programs with python3 programs[2] (even after I said I can't convince anyone to do it), while simultaneously not replacing python2 programs with python3 programs[3]. I'm trying to give you guys the benefit of the doubt, but I don't even think you're trying to have a conversation, but justify your decision that you've already made to support python3. [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13062079 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13062079 [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13062349 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13062349 [3]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13062151 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13062151