>> According to Krugman, the paper is "a serious analysis of a ridiculous subject, which is of course the opposite of what is usual in economics." So, if I und

>> According to Krugman, the paper is "a serious analysis of a ridiculous subject, which is of course the opposite of what is usual in economics." So, if I understand correctly (as non-native English speaker), the usual in economics is: "ridiculous analysis of serious subject" ??