4 ms·
According to Krugman, the paper is "a serious analysis of a ridiculous subject, which is of course the opposite of what is usual in economics." I think this pa
by xenophon 10y ago
According to Krugman, the paper is "a serious analysis of a ridiculous subject, which is of course the opposite of what is usual in economics."
I think this paper is a great example of the playfulness inherent to an effective "hacker" mindset -- do something fun and interesting, and perhaps useful conclusions will follow. Perhaps they won't, but hey, you still had fun.
- mamon 10y ago>> According to Krugman, the paper is "a serious analysis of a ridiculous subject, which is of course the opposite of what is usual in economics." So, if I understand correctly (as non-native English speaker), the usual in economics is: "ridiculous analysis of serious subject" ??
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- dsjoerg 10y agoYes that is the implication exactly.