5 ms·
It's similar. They use the same proficiency level guidelines for many different aspects when doing employee reviews. There is also a pre-established ruling on a
by city41 17y ago
It's similar. They use the same proficiency level guidelines for many different aspects when doing employee reviews. There is also a pre-established ruling on at what level of proficiency an employee of a certain level should be at for each one. So, for example, a level 62 employee should be at level 2 humor proficiency. Level 64 should be at proficiency 3, etc. Being above the expected proficiency for your level is a factor in getting a bigger bonus. You also can't get promoted until your proficiencies are at least at the next expected level.
- eru 17y agoSurely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!
- varaon 17y agoNo joke, radio.
- paulgb 17y agoThe way you put it, the Microsoft career path sounds like a boring RPG.
- sriramk 17y agoWow. I'm an engineer at Microsoft. I don't know what this particular site is about (from poking around, it seems to be targeted at education) but I can assure you that career paths and employee reviews at Microsoft have nothing to do with humor. It's a weird day when you have to write such a comment :)
- aaronbrethorst 17y agoSriram speaks the truth. I've never worked with anyone more serious than you in my life. ;)
- city41 17y agoNo, not humor. I mean that proficiency scale is used for various other more pertinent traits. I worked for Microsoft up until February.