3 ms·

Seems to work nicely in Firefox 50 release (no nightly required) once the config is set. Really happy about the way this is progressing.

• Retr0spectrum 10y ago
  For me, the WASM version was noticeably slower, with an especially noticeable JIT warmup. It might have been because the asm.js version was running at a lower resolution, so it's not a very fair comparison.
  • sp332 10y ago
    If your browser natively supports WASM, there is no JIT and no warmup time.
    • Retr0spectrum 10y ago
      Ah, I didn't realise there was no JIT. In that case, I'm not sure what caused it, but there was definitely a lower framerate at the start.
  • Elhana 10y ago
    Same for me, asm.js version runs smooth and wasm had lags in few spots and strange glitches with bots getting stuck.
• Thaxll 10y ago
  HTML5 is not progressing that fast for games, it's really really slow.