4 ms·

What exactly is so disturbing about a company digitizing what bouncers have been doing for decades?

• mattnewton 10y ago
  Bouncers don't typically work for multiple clubs, you can't hack into their brains, they have imperfect memory, etc This is like asking, what's wrong with state owned security cameras on the streets? It's digitizing what bystanders have been doing for centuries.
  • morgante 10y ago
    Well, I don't see any problem with state owned security cameras.
    • type0 10y ago
      > state owned security cameras There is a difference between security cameras and surveillance cameras. Surveillance cams are broadcasted somewhere else (maybe even over internet) and stored and reviewed. Security cameras - are for security incidents and shouldn't be broadcasted or footage stored longer than necessary (matter of hours or days depending on location). Too bad often times these state owned security cameras are actually surveillance cams disguised as innocuous things which they aren't. There is this Will Smith movie "Enemy of the State", it's fiction but our dystopic society is becoming ever more scary.
• deathanatos 10y ago
  I'm not sure what the bouncers are doing is right, either, though for some reason I'm more comfortable with it. (Which I find to be a really bad answer, frankly: is this just pushing my "comfort" of what I'm willing to put up with too far?)