>Why did you feel the need to reply with this sentence? How does it advance our conversation whatsoever? Because you replied with a link to something that did

>Why did you feel the need to reply with this sentence? How does it advance our conversation whatsoever? Because you replied with a link to something that did not further the point under discussion. >Is a large cost not a large negative impact? No, it is not. >The journal article I linked is literally about the large, economy-wide costs of regulations. And it appears to mostly disagree with the point you are trying to make.