3 ms·
I'm going to disagree with some of the other responses and say that the movie is almost completely unlike the short story. I greatly enjoyed both, but other tha
by harryh 10y ago
I'm going to disagree with some of the other responses and say that the movie is almost completely unlike the short story. I greatly enjoyed both, but other than the fact that they are both about a linguist learning a very unusual alien language there are very few similarities.
[SMALL SPOILERS AHEAD]
The short story is a very cerebral take on how language can (theoretically) change one's perception of the world and how learning a new language can make someone see the world differently. By the end of the short story Chiang has you, just a little bit, thinking in Heptapod B. Or at least trying to think about what that might be like.
The movie, illogically in my view, treats learning Heptapod B like acquiring a superpower that lets you see the future. Having acquired this super power Louise (the main character) makes a difficult choice(1) in her personal life knowing full well both the positive and negative consequences of that choice. As a newish parent I found this deeply moving and it had me thinking a lot. The experience and cinematography of the move are also great and it's enjoyable for that alone if you're into movies as a sensory experience.
(1) Some will say that it wasn't really a choice but this is my interpretation of the movie as different from the short story.