3 ms·
Yeah. Sorry dang. I'll go re-read that now, seeing as I quite clearly need of a refresher. And there's no need to cut me slack for my age (although it's nice o
by qwertyuiop924 10y ago
Yeah. Sorry dang. I'll go re-read that now, seeing as I quite clearly need of a refresher.
And there's no need to cut me slack for my age (although it's nice of you to do so): I broke the rules, and I'm responsible for my actions. Just like any other member of HN.
Twice in three years is too many times to have to say this to you.
bows head in shame
- exolymph 10y agoBummer that your apology got downvoted, since this is a gracious response to being called out. Kudos. We've all been jerks on the internet — the key is learning how to curb that behavior, which it seems like you're doing pretty well.
- qwertyuiop924 10y ago>Bummer that your apology got downvoted That trend has reversed. Dramatically. I suspect your comment has something to do with it. As for why I wrote GP in the first place, it's an important part of qwerty's code of internet interactions (yes, I have a private code of internet behavior: so do you, most likely, whether or not you've formalized it. And yes, I made up that name on the spot. It sounds pretentious, but it needed a name so I could reference it, and all the others souded equally pretentious. So there you go): "If you were wrong (whether in your argument, or in your manner), then take the appropriate action, whether that be an apology or a concession. Do so graciously: There is no shame in being wrong. There is shame in refusing to admit it, or accepting it poorly. They're words to live by. And you can trust me on that, because I've lived by them (or tried to), and it pays off. Was I irritated about a product aimed at my demographic, and how dramatically it missed the mark? Yes. But that doesn't excuse my expression of that anger.