2 ms·
I intend to switch to rspamd soon, which has built-in greylisting. However, in my test run with rspamd I did not get good enough results because my current Spam
by insertnickname 10y ago
I intend to switch to rspamd soon, which has built-in greylisting. However, in my test run with rspamd I did not get good enough results because my current SpamAssassin setup relies heavily on rejecting spam that hits two or more content filters (bayes, pyzor, etc.). I will need to implement at least a pyzor plugin for rspamd before I can switch.
rspamd, in addition to bayes filtering, has it's own fuzzy fingerprinting system. You can use your own fingerprint db and/or a public one. The public one that is configured in rspamd by default didn't seem to catch any of the spam I get though.
- eps 10y agoDon't know about rspamd, but SpamAssassin used to be way too aggressive in its stock config. E.g., it had a default rule for some "MS-Outlook" headers that just happen to be in every email sent from Outlook via a non-Exchnage mail server. That created a ton of false positives - wasn't hard to fix, but still it was a hassle.