4 ms·

I was wondering if someone who is good at JS can compare this to BluePrint[1]? [1] https://github.com/palantir/blueprint https://github.com/palantir/blueprint

• _yesmeck 10y ago
  BluePrint is a great UI toolkit. Ant Design is not only a UI toolkit, it's a design guideline which likes Material[1] and antd[2] it a official implement of Ant Design. [1]https://material.google.com https://material.google.com [2]https://www.npmjs.com/package/antd https://www.npmjs.com/package/antd
• kimshibal 10y ago
  BluePrint is a joke compare to this. Palantir can't create a landing page without crashing my browser.
  • electic 10y ago
    I believe they fixed that. However, either way, I appreciate the contribution of Palantir. Really do not think it is good to ridicule the company for open sourcing their tech.
  • phaed 10y ago
    Would like a comparison to Blueprint that doesn't include the project's landing page.
• dczot 10y ago
  Blueprint is meant for desktop applications. For example, Electron apps. You'll notice Blueprint tries to give that desktop app feel, versus Antd, which does not.
  • TomMarius 10y ago
    It isn't, according to their own words[0], they've never used Blueprint in an Electron (or other desktop) app. [0] https://github.com/palantir/blueprint/issues/202#issuecomment-261617636 https://github.com/palantir/blueprint/issues/202#issuecommen...
    • wwalser 10y ago
      I believe they meant desktop-feel as opposed to mobile first (mostly because some consider Material to be a mobile-first decision). Additional Note: Blueprint doesn't go out of it's way to degrade nicely for mobile screen sizes for most components and doesn't provide the grid layout or progressive embeds typically associated with mobile-friendly UI libraries.
  • mlsarecmg 10y ago
    I don't know, i think antd is easily suitable for desktop-like applications: http://i.imgur.com/5WN5WHE.jpg http://i.imgur.com/5WN5WHE.jpg