4 ms·

the lower levels of optimizations are supposed to be more straightforward translations of the high-level language code. you can imagine this might be useful if

• userbinator 10y ago
  On the other hand, I find O0 is significantly worse than what even a novice human Asm programmer would do if asked to manually compile code, and O1 would be around the same as a novice human.
  • 3chelon 10y ago
    Yes, I used to find that too. It's because, pre-optimization, on older architectures, the compiler outputs chunks of asm as if from a recipe book. Loads of unnecessary memory access, pointless moving data between registers, etc. A proficient human coder, on the other hand, writes assembler that is partly optimized by default. But few humans could write code like a seriously optimizing compiler, esp. on modern pipelined architectures - that stuff is unintelligible. Which is as it should be, because modern processors are not designed to be programmed directly by humans.