2 ms·

You could define what an array accepts vs returns separately (input vs output). Admittedly, you're pretty much into generics (good ones, not what Java has) at t

You could define what an array accepts vs returns separately (input vs output). Admittedly, you're pretty much into generics (good ones, not what Java has) at that point. Edit: Could use a better word for "good" that sounds less dismissive, but I couldn't think of one. Java's generics are lacking in certain areas, unfortunately.

MrBuddyCasino 10y ago
Generics in Java are pretty complicated already, so much so that very few developers fully understand them. I'm not sure the gain in complexity would be worth the added safety. I'd like to see examples in languages where this is possible, if there are any?
- deleted 10y ago
  [deleted]