3 ms·

https://www.blenderguru.com/podcasts/podcast-interview-with-ux-software-designer-duncan-macneil/ https://www.blenderguru.com/podcasts/podcast-interview-with-...

https://www.blenderguru.com/podcasts/podcast-interview-with-ux-software-designer-duncan-macneil/ https://www.blenderguru.com/podcasts/podcast-interview-with-... He followed up with a actual UX designer, who pretty much told him that his proposal was the wrong way to think about it (objectively, not subjectively). He admitted that his proposal at the blender conference was more of a discussion about the way of the future -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aIA2LaB2Iw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aIA2LaB2Iw After that, he stopped pushing so hard on the UI/UX problems of blender. I believe he is still part of the UI committee, but isnt pushing it as hard in his podcasts as he realises he doesn't have the answers.

melling 10y ago
Don't think he thought that he had the answers. Simply that the UI was bad and it needed to be fixed. He wanted to have a discussion.
- greenknight 10y ago
  This was his suggestion to how to fix blender -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWacQrEcMHk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWacQrEcMHk
  - melling 10y ago
    So, people just told him he was wrong? End of story. When someone throws out their ideas, people get to shoot them down then the status quo continues. I listened to all his podcasts. It was meant to be a conversation.
    - thomastjeffery 10y ago
      Not at all true. He was wrong, but he wasn't shot down in the slightest. One of the main focuses in development right now is the workflow/UI. https://code.blender.org/2015/07/blender-2-8-the-workflow-release/ https://code.blender.org/2015/07/blender-2-8-the-workflow-re... https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:2.8/ https://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:2.8/