> Because really, you don't really need to check whether something is an instance of "List<int>" at runtime, in a static language, unless your language sucks ;-

> Because really, you don't really need to check whether something is an instance of "List<int>" at runtime, in a static language, unless your language sucks ;-) So, I hate reflection with a burning passion, but this is wrong. You may not like doing it, but there are tons of legitimate use cases for RTTI. My primary case is for runtime "light-up" of advanced features. For instance, if you deploy an application to a series of platforms that provide non-overlapping sets of capabilities, a fantastic way of dealing with this problem is to use RTTI to check whether the instance of the object is some specialized case at runtime, then cast to the specialized object to use the specific features (e.g., GPS, touch screen) that are only available on that platform. The problem with .NET reflection is not that this dynamism exists, it's that everything is bundled together without an opt-out. I would love to have reflection split into small pieces that I could pick and choose from -- maybe I get RTTI, but I can't instantiate arbitrary generic types at runtime, for instance. Or I can't do RefEmit to JIT dynamically generated IL. These play havoc with the runtime, forcing it to support incredibly elaborate systems just for simple features, so providing some guarantees would make the runtime's job way easier while also providing developer flexibility.