5 ms·
Might be good if you don't type touch then. It'll look like you're looking at the camera (them) more often. (As for myself, I'd just look arrogant...) The minu
by sundvor 10y ago
Might be good if you don't type touch then. It'll look like you're looking at the camera (them) more often. (As for myself, I'd just look arrogant...)
The minute someone can magic out a way to turn a monitor into a multi point camera, add some eye tracking logic and integrate that with the conference display, we'll have a small video teleconference revolution on our hands.
Unfortunately, doing a search I see that Apple has already thought of that.. http://appleinsider.com/articles/09/01/08/apple_files_patent_for_camera_hidden_behind_display http://appleinsider.com/articles/09/01/08/apple_files_patent...
- 20161112 10y agoA bit 1984 for my tastes. I still put tape over my laptop webcam.
- andrepd 10y agoAs you should. If Zuckerberg does it so do you.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- sliken 10y agoThe real answer is a 3d camera. That way you can actually make eye contact and interact much more realistically. Fortunately the apple patent doesn't seem to apply.
- sundvor 10y agoAh, yes, that sounds like what we need! Eye contact is lost with today's cameras, and solving this would have a great impact on remote communications.