3 ms·
It's scandalous that it was a better investment to simply walk away then lose money on every transaction? And then you think they should be taxed because the go
by dlp211 10y ago
It's scandalous that it was a better investment to simply walk away then lose money on every transaction? And then you think they should be taxed because the government is forcing them to lose money?
I'm not some anti-government zealot, but think about what you are saying/asking for here.
- pmoriarty 10y agoIf they still own the building and don't let people live there, then that is scandalous. I'll stand by that.
- PrimalDual 10y agoI don't think there are mustache twirling landlords that buy buildings only to leave them empty and refuse to let people live in them. Frankly it's appalling that government regulation could get bad enough that a landlord's only choice to minimize his losses is to leave a building unoccupied. I really hope the parent's comment is an exaggeration or a myth. What is even worse is that people actually think it's somehow the landlord's fault.