>in the over/under emphasis, hyperbole and unnecessarily agitating tone I agree. Greenwald Tweeted not long after the WaPo article came out that the article wa

>in the over/under emphasis, hyperbole and unnecessarily agitating tone I agree. Greenwald Tweeted not long after the WaPo article came out that the article was "journalistic garbage, and people were passing out around uncritically because it served political agendas." An emotional response from Greenwald. Greenwald is an absolute godsend in today's world of 1984, but he is not perfect and his writing style can and has been much better than this.