2 ms·
> the WaPo article cites Wikileaks as "fake news." The WaPo article doesn't mention Wikileaks. I just searched the page to verify my memory of it. Feel free to
by hackuser 10y ago
> the WaPo article cites Wikileaks as "fake news."
The WaPo article doesn't mention Wikileaks. I just searched the page to verify my memory of it. Feel free to check for yourself:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/russian-propaganda-effort-helped-spread-fake-news-during-election-experts-say/2016/11/24/793903b6-8a40-4ca9-b712-716af66098fe_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/russian-prop...
- wallace_f 10y agoFrom the article: > The article by reporter Craig Timberg – headlined “Russian propaganda effort helped spread ‘fake news’ during election, experts say” – cites a report by a new, anonymous website calling itself “PropOrNot,” which claims that millions of Americans have been deceived this year in a massive Russian “misinformation campaign.” Here is the WaPo's source: http://www.propornot.com/p/the-list.html http://www.propornot.com/p/the-list.html There they list Wikileaks as "Russian Propaganda," what the WaPo called in their article "Fake News."