3 ms·
The list is of sources that repeat Russian propaganda, IIRC. If so, Wikileaks certainly belongs on the list, having published information very likely provided t
by hackuser 10y ago
The list is of sources that repeat Russian propaganda, IIRC. If so, Wikileaks certainly belongs on the list, having published information very likely provided to them by Russian intelligence. Drudge would not surprise me, as it is already a propaganda site for the a U.S. political group.
- return0 10y ago> Russian propaganda While it might be to their interests , podesta's emails were not russian propaganda per se.
- hackuser 10y ago> While it might be to their interests , podesta's emails were not russian propaganda per se. As a technical point, real emails absolutely can be propaganda. Good propaganda isn't all lies, or even mostly lies. It needs to be believable, like a good con. This comment says it well: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13045955 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13045955
- return0 10y agook i love me some propaganda then