> Joking aside, it's not ridiculous to castigate a piece of bad journalism by a renowned paper. Of course it isn't ridiculous, unless you do it in a thoroughly

> Joking aside, it's not ridiculous to castigate a piece of bad journalism by a renowned paper. Of course it isn't ridiculous, unless you do it in a thoroughly ridiculous manner. I read the article on TI first then the WaPo, and have to say it fell well short of expectations raised by the former. I was expecting something out of Pravda C1922. The article is almost entirely hyperbolic, to the point of imagining the motives of PropOrNot, and then analogising said motives (with an added twist of sinister for effect).