3 ms·
non open source, based on clang, but faster? in the perfect world I would like that everyone who uses clang would freely benefit from this improvement. should
by trymas 10y ago
non open source, based on clang, but faster?
in the perfect world I would like that everyone who uses clang would freely benefit from this improvement. should some big and good corporations just buy out those guys?
- greglindahl 10y agoThe entire point of using a BSD/MIT-style license is that it gives "freedom" to a different set of people than the GPL does. In this case, why is it not perfect for someone to invest money building a commercial product on top of clang? Isn't it just fine that they want to make a lot of money?
- pjmlp 10y agoThat is the GPL world, the BSD world is all almost making this kind of work possible. So don't worship MIT/BSD and complain later about it when companies prevent you to get the code.