4 ms·
The Supreme Court would like a word with you.
by wfarr 16y ago
The Supreme Court would like a word with you.
- cynicalkane 16y agoWhat? The legal notion of "legal personhood" and actual personhood are not comparable, not even legally, and especially not in the context of the discussion at hand.
- djb_hackernews 16y agoparent is referring to this: http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/01/analysis-the-personhood-of-corporations/ http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/01/analysis-the-personhood-of... which was generally interpreted to mean the SCOTUS decided corporations are people.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- billybob 16y agoSo, to recap, legally being a person and being a person aren't, legally, the same.
- cynicalkane 16y agoPlease see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_person http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_person "This legal fiction does not mean these entities are human beings, but rather means that the law allows them to act as persons for certain limited purposes..." Emphasis mine. This stuff isn't even on topic, but when people insist on insulting my intelligence with snide pseudo-logical comments, I will insist on correcting them.
- pixelbath 16y agoIn other words, you like feeding the trolls?
- wfarr 16y agoThe comment was a jab at the court's decision to move in the direction they have. I'm sorry that wasn't clear to you. Beyond that, I find it incredibly silly that you find your intelligence so easily insulted. Perhaps it's time to take a chill pill.