4 ms·
> Time tracking (Stechuhren) is commonplace, so I rather doubt this. When trying to rollout a SAAS app in Germany that ties individuals to the time to track wo
by gkafkg8y8 10y ago
> Time tracking (Stechuhren) is commonplace, so I rather doubt this.
When trying to rollout a SAAS app in Germany that ties individuals to the time to track workflow and time they spent on individual tasks, it was pushed back on because it was "illegal". It was only used for auditing purposes; if there were a problem, auditing data would indicate who was involved so that we could have a talk with them to ensure the process could be changed if needed to avoid the problem in the future. But, the Germans said that tracking time like this could be used to track employees in a way or for a purpose that would break privacy laws/regulations.
More information about German privacy laws here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundesdatenschutzgesetz https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bundesdatenschutzgesetz
Also, the HR software that we are using for time and attendance was not registered in Germany and had to go through several months of certification due to the laws there. I don't know how much of that is specifically due to privacy laws/regulations, though.
- dom0 10y ago> When trying to rollout a SAAS app in Germany that ties individuals to the time to track workflow and time they spent on individual tasks, it was pushed back on because it was "illegal". I doubt that this was the real reason, project and time management software with the same functionality is widespread. There is likely more to this. (I'm not saying you're not truthful, just that I don't think this was really the reason why it was pushed back by those that did). It could be, for example, that the application due to it's SaaS nature did not fully comply with some regulations regarding safe harbour. These might have required the SaaS to be hosted in specific countries. Or management decided otherwise, or any other reason.
- lima 10y ago> When trying to rollout a SAAS app in Germany that ties individuals to the time to track workflow and time they spent on individual tasks, it was pushed back on because it was "illegal". Probably rightfully so.