4 ms·
> The clean break of 3 and the sanity it brings to the language is undeniable. Well, I can't deny they broke it, but sanity is pretty deniable. Python has alw
by I_deny_it 10y ago
> The clean break of 3 and the sanity it brings to the language is undeniable.
Well, I can't deny they broke it, but sanity is pretty deniable. Python has always been a dynamic language, and one of the core mantras was "there should be one obvious way to do it" (in contrast to Perl). All the new type annotation stuff and the multiple ways to handle string formatting are steps in very weird directions. Maybe they should make a Python version 4 to clean some of that mess up.
- _coldfire 10y ago>new type annotation stuff xrange is now range? >multiple ways to handle string formatting This is a problem? As for sanity: bytes/unicode integer division chained exceptions os.scandir performance I'm keen for 4 when it comes. Clinging to the past is only going to make things harder.
- I_deny_it 10y ago>> multiple ways to handle string formatting > This is a problem? Yes, if you think, "There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it."
- reachtarunhere 10y agoThat would put us in the league of JS folks. New JS every year (month?)