4 ms·
What's the point? Why not do it the other way around and put everything in /bin? It almost feels like /usr is the new root.
by parent5446 10y ago
What's the point? Why not do it the other way around and put everything in /bin? It almost feels like /usr is the new root.
- duskwuff 10y ago1. Less disruption. Most software is already installed to /usr. 2. Installing all software to /usr means that /usr can be made read-only when not installing/upgrading software. This isn't possible if installing to the root, as directories like /etc and /var have to be left writable.
- parent5446 10y agoAh, thanks for the quick explanation.
- rhizome 10y ago/etc doesn't generally have to be writable, and in a read-only root environment /var will be on its own slice.
- pkaye 10y agoDo you mean the partition containing /usr will be mounted ad read-only?
- saalaa 10y agoHe said can be made, that's an option.
- xyproto 10y agoNever heard of /usr/etc and /usr/var ...
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]