3 ms·

I think you've take the uncharitable view of an implication that everyone is forced to work to fill up hours. Realistically there are loads of things that coul

by aidos 10y ago

I think you've take the uncharitable view of an implication that everyone is forced to work to fill up hours. Realistically there are loads of things that could be done to make the world a better place. Equally there are lots of people out of work. If someone can provide the funds to marry those things together, it's a win win. But who pays? Maybe Apple could go all philanthropic and depart with all that cash they're carrying.

remir 10y ago
Bingo. It's not a work problem; there's so much work to do. The problem is who will pay and how much.
- knieveltech 10y ago
  Oh really? Doing what, exactly?
  - robryan 10y ago
    Not hard to imagine that there would be a lot of work out there of marginal economic value but not enough to employ someone at the minimum wage to do.
  - vacri 10y ago
    The original comment suggests a few things.
  - mdpopescu 10y ago
    Feed me grapes?
JulianMorrison 10y ago
I'm much more concerned that everyone is forced to work on things that aren't what they want to do and is still running under the whip of starvation. I want that whip entirely removed. I want people free to follow their passion. And I want these things for myself, because I selfishly object to having my life wasted.