3 ms·
Perhaps if you read the article without the intent to argue everything written because it contradicts your ideology? > What he's saying is that no one needs to
by dvtv75 10y ago
Perhaps if you read the article without the intent to argue everything written because it contradicts your ideology?
> What he's saying is that no one needs to do anything of value anymore.
Can you point to the particular sentence where this is stated? Didn't think so.
The article I read said that the majority of jobs aren't paid at a level appropriate to their value, and that without the (rather limited US) welfare programs to support them, the bulk of employees would be below the poverty line, and with the impending automation of almost 50% of available jobs it'll be those bottom-line jobs that go.
The article then tells us that we'll need to redefine our attitudes to both income and work, but nowhere can I find the statement that "no one needs to do anything of value anymore." It tells us that almost half of the population already don't do anything of sufficient value, and many of those jobs are going to go away.
- cmdrfred 10y agoTo your point. 51% of the American workforce makes less that 30 thousand dollars a year. That number is trending upward rapidly. http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/10/goodbye-middle-class-51-percent-of-all-american-workers-make-less-than-30000-dollars-a-year.html http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/10/goodbye-middle-class-...
- IanDrake 10y ago"In short, it lets us say: enough already. Fuck work." I feel like that's pretty clear. You're right though, it does contradict my "ideology". I'm willing to be enlightened though but there were no rational arguments in this article to sway me.