What am I missing? That most of the people who do have that experience, have, shall we say, shown such poor judgement that they should be automatically and fir

What am I missing? That most of the people who do have that experience, have, shall we say, shown such poor judgement that they should be automatically and firmly excluded from the process? Do you want people to whom the modern meaning of "neo-con" applies doing this? As Thiel himself noted, "A normal country doesn't fight five simultaneous undeclared wars." This is one of Trump's biggest breaks from the GOPe(stablishment), after immigration. And unlike the latter, one I think most of us on the Right and Left support. Note also there's little bench depth, so to speak, in Presidential transition processes when they've been happening at 8 year intervals since 1992 and switching between parties. Should Trump be emulating in any way W's transition process and methods of selecting people? I'm pretty sure that was the absolutely worst thing he was at as a President, that and his weird loyalty to the duds he'd selected, Trump at least fires fast.... His father was no prize as well, which means you'd have to reach back to 1980, and I'll bet most of the people on Reagan's transition team are dead or seriously retired. Anyway, Team Trump is getting good advice from retired members of the professional military, but you definitely don't want to entirely depend on them. Note also Trump is pretty good at picking people, he went through 3 campaign managers, and won because he did that, not in spite of it. Compare to, oh, Hillary's first in 2008, who lost her that nomination, apparently before Hillary realized it.