3 ms·
I'm not so sure. There's a lot of gov.uk stuff running on non-gvt gear these days thanks to GDS; (aws, skyscape, others on gcloud) -- the problem with how that
by cyberpunk 10y ago
I'm not so sure.
There's a lot of gov.uk stuff running on non-gvt gear these days thanks to GDS; (aws, skyscape, others on gcloud) -- the problem with how that's gone though is while they're actually running in "the cloud" and tryig to do things more 'modern' the architecture has to be accredited by a bunch of GCHQ folks who apparently are totally insane yet you can never actually talk to. And so you end up only being able to build what looks like a 2000's datacentre arch with 500 /28 vlans and weird IDS appliances and so on, otherwise CESG won't let you hook up to any of the data-sources you probably need.
In that style arch, where you can't just provision things and changing even a netmask requires your whole architecture to be re-accredited otherwise you'll lose access to the PSN; what possible benefits are there of running in the cloud?
It's more expensive, needs constant oversight from accreditors and generally sucks.
The legacy gov DCs are a shitshow too; but that's down to people like capgemini and ibm or whoever and well, fuck them.
- kesor 10y agoYou mean the IBM that is doing $10m contracts and then paying $30m for screwing these up? http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-25/ibm-to-pay-over-$30m-in-compensation-for-census-fail/8057240 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-25/ibm-to-pay-over-$30m-i...