4 ms·
I have lots of issues with this author and article. I am one of the locals from that region. The picture caste in this article is very biased and not acceptable
by fdsak 10y ago
I have lots of issues with this author and article. I am one of the locals from that region. The picture caste in this article is very biased and not acceptable. There are issues but not that bleak as depicted by the author. Specially the things describe about Gilgit and Hunza are not correct.
The KKH has greatly helped reduced the poverty and its a vital resource for us and all the remote communities.
"Violence has been a part of life here since Pakistan and India were partitioned in 1947"
>> absolutely wrong , its started after US started funding Taliban after late 90s and now its completely peaceful.
"the signs of the cheapness of life are everywhere—starving children and maimed old men line the sidewalks"
>> there is poverty but not that much as forcefully describe here.
"more than 10,000 people have been shot, bombed and lynched there during the ‘90s alone"
>> Ask who was behind it ? and you will get name , who funded cold-war, .. just the same b.s again ..
"A stone’s throw from the Line of Control between Pakistani- and Indian-held Kashmir"
>> I dont have any good words, there is not a single place where we are so exposed to LOC crossfire.It could be Kashmir but not Gilgit-Baltistan(GB).
Lots of lies and biased commentary .. take it with grain of salt.
- trelltron 10y agoThis article is from 1999 though. It's probably wrong for 2016, but that's to be expected.
- LordFrith 10y ago> Ask who was behind it ? and you will get name , who funded cold-war, .. just the same b.s again .. I am pretty sure Ted Rall will agree with you that meddling from foreign empires, like the US, causes violence in Central Asia.
- LordFrith 10y agoHave you read Ted Rall's 2006 book Silk Road To Ruin? I'm interested enough in the opinion of a Central Asia local that I would mail you a copy.
- fdsak 10y agosure that would be interesting