I'll agree more in-depth investigation was warranted. The end-result fallout was/is still incredible, and if the media could have played a part in preventing an

I'll agree more in-depth investigation was warranted. The end-result fallout was/is still incredible, and if the media could have played a part in preventing and or mitigating the war in Iraq, it definitely would have been a definite good thing. However, on the "fake-news" front, do you really consider the government misleading the press in 2002/2003 to be on the same scale as the widespread adoption of the recent tabloid-quality news? From the studies and reports I've been reading lately, it sounds like the election was heavily swayed by the online equivalent of the national enquirer. Doesn't that bother you?